Corrections Policy

1. Commitment to Accuracy

BlueRadius Cyber publishes editorial content, including analysis, breach reporting, regulatory commentary, and threat intelligence, for cybersecurity decision makers. When we make a factual error, we correct it. This policy explains how to report an error to us, how we handle reports, and where corrections appear on published content.

2. How to Report an Error

If you believe we have published an error, please contact us:

When submitting a correction request, please include the URL of the piece, the specific statement you believe is incorrect, what the correct information is, and a primary source we can verify against. The more specific the request, the faster we can act on it.

3. How We Handle Reports

We review every correction request. Our review process is:

• Initial acknowledgment within two business days of receiving the report
• Verification against primary sources (official disclosures, regulator filings, vendor advisories, court records)
• Author review by the original author of the piece, where possible
• Decision: correct the piece, clarify the piece, or explain why we believe the original is accurate
• Response to the person who reported the error, regardless of outcome

Most corrections are resolved within five business days. Complex factual disputes, for example contested interpretation of a regulation or a contested breach attribution, may take longer.

4. Where Corrections Appear

When we make a correction to a published piece, the correction is noted at the bottom of the piece with the date and a brief description of what changed. We do not silently change facts in published content; corrections are transparent.

For example, a correction note might read:

5. Types of Corrections

We distinguish between three categories of changes to published content:

• Corrections: material factual errors (incorrect dollar figures, wrong dates, misnamed entities, misattributed quotes, incorrect technical specifications). These are always noted with a dated correction.
• Clarifications: content that was technically accurate but where additional context substantially changes a reader's understanding. Clarifications are noted at the bottom of the piece.
• Updates: significant new developments after publication. For example, a regulatory deadline being extended, a settlement amount being revised by a court, or a vendor releasing a patch we previously covered. Significant updates are dated; minor updates (typos, formatting, link maintenance) are made without notation.

6. Significant Errors and Retractions

When we determine that a piece is so substantially incorrect that a correction cannot adequately address the error, we retract the piece. Retracted pieces remain accessible at their original URL with a clearly visible retraction notice replacing the original content, explaining what the original piece claimed and why it has been retracted. We do not delete retracted content from the public record.

7. Updates We Do Not Note

Some changes do not warrant a public note: spelling and punctuation fixes, internal link maintenance, image replacements that do not change meaning, formatting normalization, and category or tag adjustments. These are routine editorial maintenance and are not the subject of this policy.

8. Anonymous Reports

We accept anonymous correction reports. The validity of a correction depends on the underlying facts, not the identity of the person reporting. Anonymous reports must still include enough specificity (the URL, the statement, the correct information, and a verifiable source) for our team to act on them.

9. Related Policies

See our editorial standards for our broader approach to sourcing, fact-checking, and editorial integrity. See our privacy policy for how we handle the personal information you provide when submitting a correction request.